Court judgments are the raw material of case law — they tell you how courts have interpreted statutes, what principles apply to specific facts, and what outcomes are likely in your own situation. They can look intimidating, but every judgment follows a predictable structure once you know what to look for.
Where to find judgments for free
BAILII (British and Irish Legal Information Institute) is the authoritative free database for England and Wales judgments from the High Court upwards. The Judiciary of England and Wales publishes significant County Court and Family Court decisions. The UK Supreme Court publishes all its decisions with press summaries. For Employment Tribunal decisions, use the GOV.UK tribunal decisions search.
The structure of a typical judgment
Header: the case name (parties and year), the court, the judge's name, and the date of judgment. The neutral citation — for example, [2026] EWCA Civ 1234 — is the official reference. EWCA = Court of Appeal (England and Wales); UKSC = UK Supreme Court; EWHC = High Court; UKEAT = Employment Appeal Tribunal.
Introduction / Background: sets out the facts agreed between the parties and the legal issues in dispute. Read this first — it tells you whether the case is relevant to your situation.
Submissions: a summary of each side's arguments. Often the longest section; skim unless you need to understand a specific argument.
Discussion / Analysis: the judge's reasoning — how they interpret the law, which authorities they follow, and why they prefer one argument over another. This is where the ratio lives.
Decision / Order: what the court actually decided. Read this last to confirm the outcome, but the reasoning in the discussion section is what creates precedent.
Finding the ratio decidendi
The ratio decidendi (ratio) is the legally binding part of the judgment — the principle of law applied to the specific facts that led to the decision. Everything else is obiter dicta (things said by the way) and is not binding, though it may be persuasive. The ratio is rarely labelled — you have to extract it. Look for sentences that say "the correct principle is…", "I hold that…", or "it follows that…" in the analysis section. A useful test: if you changed this finding, would the decision be different? If yes, it is probably part of the ratio.
Checking whether it binds your case
Under the doctrine of precedent, decisions of higher courts bind lower courts in the same jurisdiction. In England and Wales: UK Supreme Court decisions bind everyone; Court of Appeal decisions bind the High Court and below; High Court decisions bind County Courts. Decisions of the same court are persuasive but not binding. Check: (1) which court decided the case; (2) whether the key facts are materially similar to yours — a judgment about one type of contract may not bind a different type; (3) whether the statute applied has since been amended. A judgment on a repealed or amended provision has limited value unless the new provision uses the same language.
Reading a Court of Appeal judgment with multiple judges
The Court of Appeal usually sits with three judges. Each may give a separate judgment. Read all three to find the majority view. If two judges agree and one dissents, the majority sets the ratio. If all three agree but give different reasons, identify the common thread. "Agreed — for the reasons given by [judge name]" means that judge adopts another's reasoning.
Employment Tribunal decisions
Employment Tribunal decisions are not binding precedent — they are first-instance decisions of a specialist tribunal, not a court. They are useful as illustrations of how the law is applied in practice, but the Employment Appeal Tribunal, Court of Appeal, and Supreme Court are the binding sources. When reading an ET decision, focus on how it applied the legal test to the facts rather than treating its conclusion as a rule. For the key legal tests in unfair dismissal and discrimination cases, start with the Employment Appeal Tribunal's guidance decisions, many of which are on BAILII.
A practical shortcut
For Supreme Court and Court of Appeal judgments, read the headnote (the editor's summary at the top of the BAILII page) first — it summarises the facts, the issue, and the decision in a few paragraphs. Then go to the judgment itself only if the headnote suggests the case is directly relevant. The UK Supreme Court also publishes press summaries in plain English for every decision, which are far more accessible than the full judgment for non-lawyers.